Just last week we wrote about the oft-visited subject of the refusal of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to approve a spot Bitcoin ETF, even though it has approved futures Bitcoin ETFs.  And we noted that Grayscale Investments LLC (Grayscale) has appealed to the D.C. Circuit the SEC’s decision in its case, stressing the arbitrary nature of the SEC’s position concerning spot ETFs; oral argument is scheduled for March 7.

On January 30, 2023, Osprey Funds LLC, a Fairfield, CT based company, sued Grayscale in Connecticut state court for unfair trade practices.  Grayscale, of course, is the largest player in this field, with $14.6 billion  under management (according to the Complaint), as sponsor of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (“GBTC”).  Osprey, a competitor, manages about $100 million in assets. In connection with the above issue, Osprey alleges as follows:

Since no later than in or about late 2020…Grayscale has regularly advertised and promoted its service in a false and misleading way as providing access to Grayscale Bitcoin Trust with a definitive conversion of the Grayscale Bitcoin Fund to an exchange traded fund [which] it referred to as “likely,” despite knowing that such a description was false, as the SEC had consistently rejected the possibility of such conversion for a Bitcoin commodity fund since in or before late 2020.

The timing is certainly interesting, in light of Grayscale’s lawsuit against the SEC.  Perhaps it is best viewed through the prism of the open letter that Osprey CEO Greg King wrote to the CEO of Grayscale’s parent, asking that Osprey be named as the sponsor of GBTC to replace Grayscale.

That offer comes on the heels of the proposal made earlier this year by Valkyrie, the company behind the $19 million Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF, a Bitcoin futures fund, to take over management of GBTC.  Both Valkyrie and Osprey argue that they are better positioned to reduce the discount at which GBTC was trading, compared to the net asset value, which had reached 49%.  Both also promised to reduce the two percent fee that Grayscale charged.

Grayscale issued a response to the lawsuit that called it “frivolous” and said: “The conversion of GBTC to an ETF is the best long-term product structure for Grayscale’s investors, and approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF would directly benefit our industry peers.   At Grayscale, we remain confident in our common-sense, compelling legal arguments, and we look forward to a final decision from the D.C. Court of Appeals by fall 2023.”

Author

Email
David Zaslowsky is partner in the Litigation Department of Baker McKenzie's New York office. He helps companies solve complex commercial disputes in arbitration and litigation, especially those involving cross-border issues and Section 1782 discovery. David has a degree in computer science and, as a result, has worked on numerous technical-related disputes, including, most recently, those involving blockchain and artificial intelligence. In April 2025, Attorney Intel named David one of the top 25 blockchain lawyers in the country. He is the editor of the Firm's blockchain blog and co-editor of the firm's International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter. David has been included for a number of years in the Chambers USA Guide and Chambers Global Guide for his expertise in international arbitration. He also sits as an arbitrator and is on the roster of arbitrators for a number of arbitral institutions. David sits on the Board and chairs the governance committee of the New York International Arbitration Center, and is a founding member of the International Arbitration Club of New York. For over 35 years, he has written and spoken often on the subjects of arbitration and international litigation.